It is very difficult to understand the risk. There are various point of views in the market; most of them are in the favor of MTs. I read lots of them and finally, noted that "EMR will not take the place of the medical transcriptionist."
"Electronic Medical Records is define as how the health records are stored, not how they are transcribed."
Doctors and insurances used to have paper files for each patient, but with the EMR system they would be able to store the records electronically and can view and edit without any paper print.
MTs would be able to get medical transcription work on home bases with the help of digital transcription methods in the future. They will receive dictations files and templates with demography filled automatically and transcribe the files from home offices. Once files will be done, MTs will upload them back to the facility’s secure server.
"Electronic Medical Records is define as how the health records are stored, not how they are transcribed."
Doctors and insurances used to have paper files for each patient, but with the EMR system they would be able to store the records electronically and can view and edit without any paper print.
MTs would be able to get medical transcription work on home bases with the help of digital transcription methods in the future. They will receive dictations files and templates with demography filled automatically and transcribe the files from home offices. Once files will be done, MTs will upload them back to the facility’s secure server.
Do not mix EMR and SRT (speach recognition technology)
